<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: First impressions of the Icecrypt T2400</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gonedigital.net/2010/11/10/first-impressions-of-the-icecrypt-t2400/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gonedigital.net/2010/11/10/first-impressions-of-the-icecrypt-t2400/</link>
	<description>Nigel Whitfield’s digital TV &#38; technology blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 16:23:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gone Digital &#124; Icecrypt T2400 – updated impressions</title>
		<link>http://gonedigital.net/2010/11/10/first-impressions-of-the-icecrypt-t2400/comment-page-1/#comment-3194</link>
		<dc:creator>Gone Digital &#124; Icecrypt T2400 – updated impressions</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Dec 2010 12:07:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gonedigital.net/?p=806#comment-3194</guid>
		<description>[...] already done a quick first impressions piece about the T2400, and I’m aware some of you have been waiting a while for a more detailed [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] already done a quick first impressions piece about the T2400, and I’m aware some of you have been waiting a while for a more detailed [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nigel</title>
		<link>http://gonedigital.net/2010/11/10/first-impressions-of-the-icecrypt-t2400/comment-page-1/#comment-1926</link>
		<dc:creator>Nigel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Nov 2010 11:36:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gonedigital.net/?p=806#comment-1926</guid>
		<description>Well, I&#039;ve been using it as my main PVR for watching, and I can say that I like using it, but there are still firmware coming out at a fairly steady rate - I should get another one today to play with, and I&#039;ll report more when I&#039;ve installed that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I&#8217;ve been using it as my main PVR for watching, and I can say that I like using it, but there are still firmware coming out at a fairly steady rate &#8211; I should get another one today to play with, and I&#8217;ll report more when I&#8217;ve installed that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan S</title>
		<link>http://gonedigital.net/2010/11/10/first-impressions-of-the-icecrypt-t2400/comment-page-1/#comment-1908</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Nov 2010 21:14:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gonedigital.net/?p=806#comment-1908</guid>
		<description>Hi Nigel

Many thanks for your photos and preliminary thoughts on the T2400!

I was wondering, 11 days on, whether you had had time to look into the PVR any further, or whether you&#039;re still waiting for new firmware.

I&#039;d be very interested to hear you thoughts on picture quality (SD and HD) as well as the media/network functions.  As a .mkv fan it would be great to know if this unit can handle them...

Many thanks for you work so far!

Alan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Nigel</p>
<p>Many thanks for your photos and preliminary thoughts on the T2400!</p>
<p>I was wondering, 11 days on, whether you had had time to look into the PVR any further, or whether you&#8217;re still waiting for new firmware.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d be very interested to hear you thoughts on picture quality (SD and HD) as well as the media/network functions.  As a .mkv fan it would be great to know if this unit can handle them&#8230;</p>
<p>Many thanks for you work so far!</p>
<p>Alan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

