<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Calling time on Sky Sports via a CAM?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gonedigital.net/2010/10/15/calling-time-on-sky-sports-via-a-cam/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gonedigital.net/2010/10/15/calling-time-on-sky-sports-via-a-cam/</link>
	<description>Nigel Whitfield’s digital TV &#38; technology blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 16:23:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nigel</title>
		<link>http://gonedigital.net/2010/10/15/calling-time-on-sky-sports-via-a-cam/comment-page-1/#comment-2669</link>
		<dc:creator>Nigel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2010 17:07:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gonedigital.net/?p=746#comment-2669</guid>
		<description>Thanks for pointing that out; TopUpTV issued a statement today, and I&#039;m just writing a piece about that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for pointing that out; TopUpTV issued a statement today, and I&#8217;m just writing a piece about that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jooles</title>
		<link>http://gonedigital.net/2010/10/15/calling-time-on-sky-sports-via-a-cam/comment-page-1/#comment-2663</link>
		<dc:creator>Jooles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2010 12:30:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gonedigital.net/?p=746#comment-2663</guid>
		<description>Ofcom update, ruling against Sky:

On 13 December 2010 Ofcom concluded its assessment of Top Up TV&#039;s complaint, issuing a decision to give a direction to Sky in respect of compliance with Condition 14A of each of the Television Licensable Content Service licenses for Sky Sports 1 and Sky Sports 2. The direction states that a term of Sky&#039;s agreement for the wholesale supply of Sky Sports 1 and Sky Sports 2 to TUTV, restricting provision of the channels via CI+ CAMs, is in breach of Condition 14A and requires that term to be removed. 

http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/enforcement/competition-bulletins/closed-cases/all-closed-cases/cw_TUTV_Sky/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ofcom update, ruling against Sky:</p>
<p>On 13 December 2010 Ofcom concluded its assessment of Top Up TV&#8217;s complaint, issuing a decision to give a direction to Sky in respect of compliance with Condition 14A of each of the Television Licensable Content Service licenses for Sky Sports 1 and Sky Sports 2. The direction states that a term of Sky&#8217;s agreement for the wholesale supply of Sky Sports 1 and Sky Sports 2 to TUTV, restricting provision of the channels via CI+ CAMs, is in breach of Condition 14A and requires that term to be removed. </p>
<p><a href="http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/enforcement/competition-bulletins/closed-cases/all-closed-cases/cw_TUTV_Sky/" rel="nofollow">http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/enforcement/competition-bulletins/closed-cases/all-closed-cases/cw_TUTV_Sky/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

